Scott Lucas: Legal Ideals & Methods

Legal Philosophy and Approach: Insights from Scott Lucas – Gain an understanding of the core principles and strategies that define Scott Lucas’s approach to law. This section delves into his commitment to justice, client-centered service, and innovative problem-solving.

Icon 1 Problem Solving

At the core of our practice is a belief that not every workplace dispute warrants a courtroom battle. Scott begins each consultation with a critical inquiry: “Is there a legal issue at play?” Surprisingly, most situations do not meet this criterion.When a matter does hint at legal complexities, Scott employs a rigorous method of investigation. Drawing upon decades of legal expertise and research, he crafts a series of detailed inquiries designed to uncover the essential legal and factual elements of a case. This methodical process, refined through years of handling real-world cases, helps ensure that critical aspects are not overlooked. It also brings into sharp relief the strengths and weaknesses of a potential case, facilitating a grounded evaluation of its merits. Deciding to take on a case hinges on three key questions: the strength of the case, the extent of damages, and the employer’s ability to satisfy a judgment. Upon accepting a case, Scott commits to a collaborative and strategic partnership with the client, aimed at achieving the set objectives. His approach in dealing with opposing counsel is characterized by a blend of firmness and respect. Firmness is crucial in litigation, as it underscores our resolve to advocate strongly for our client’s rights. Simultaneously, Scott maintains a commitment to civility, reflecting our belief in the importance of respectful interactions, even in contentious situations. This balanced approach not only fosters a constructive legal environment but also upholds the dignity and respect owed to all individuals, regardless of their stance.

Read More
Icon 2 Ethical Practice

Acknowledging human imperfections is crucial, especially in the legal profession. Scott understands that the path of litigation is fraught with potential conflicts and ethical dilemmas. His approach to navigating these challenges is rooted in self-reflection and empathy. When faced with a complex ethical decision, Scott’s guiding principle is to consider the client’s perspective, asking himself, “If I were the client, how would I want to be treated in this situation?” This client-first mindset fosters a culture of integrity and respect—one that shows a deep respect for the trust clients place in us.

Read More
Icon 3 Client-Centered Service

Our legal practice is built on a foundation of trust and a deep commitment to our clients’ goals. Scott maintains open and honest communications with clients, and timely responds to client calls and emails. He believes in transparency, sharing his honest opinion and insights, even when it might not be what the client hopes to hear. Scott keeps his clients’ objectives at the forefront, especially through challenging times, as he navigates the complexities of the legal process while keeping clients informed and engaged every step of the way.

Read More
Icon 4 Commitment to Justice

Our dedication to justice involves a relentless pursuit of our clients’ rights, even in the face of daunting challenges. Often, employees who seek our help are in a vulnerable position, cornered by a significant power disparity. Employers typically hold the upper hand, with greater resources, control over crucial information, and influence over key witnesses. Furthermore, it’s not uncommon for employers to deploy a range of strategies to evade accountability, including invasive discovery requests, discovery stonewalling, baseless defenses, retaliatory counterclaims, and deliberate delays. In response to these adversarial tactics, our resolve only strengthens. We remain unwavering in our commitment, undeterred by attempts to undermine the pursuit of justice. Our focus is always on the end goal: to advocate effectively for our clients and ensure their rights are protected and upheld.

Read More

Tracing Scott Lucas’s path to legal excellence

Scott Lucas: The Origin Story

Our Founder’s Journey: The Story of Scott Lucas – Dive into the inspiring narrative of Scott Lucas, tracing his evolution over the course of 30 years. This section offers a glimpse into Scott’s achievements, career milestones, and the foundational experiences that helped him become a respected litigator and thought leader in the field of employment law.

Scott began his legal career in the mid-1990s as an associate at the Law Offices of Michael G. Berger, a high-end Park Avenue law boutique litigation firm representing high-profile clients in a wide range of complex cases. In this challenging environment, Scott experienced his professional “baptism by fire,” a crucial phase that equipped him to navigate high-pressure situations throughout his career.

Scott A. Lucas

Founder of Law Offices of Scott A. Lucas

In 1998, leveraging the invaluable insights and skills garnered from his early career, Scott embarked on a new venture, founding the Law Offices of Scott A. Lucas, a New York-based employment law practice.

Scott’s journey over the past 30 years has been marked by a steady accumulation of knowledge and wisdom. The practice of law, he has learned, is governed by unwritten rules as well as written ones, and is replete with pitfalls of overconfidence, bias, impulsivity, anger, despair, fear, and pride. Scott seeks to reign in these all-too-common tendencies, and to pursue client goals in a more grounded, even-tempered, and steadfast manner.

This approach has not only shaped Scott’s approach to law, but has made Scott’s journey a narrative of growth, learning, and steadfast commitment to justice, underscored by a series of notable successes, including:

This approach has not only shaped Scott’s approach to law, but has made Scott’s journey a narrative of growth, learning, and steadfast commitment to justice, underscored by a series of notable successes, including:

  • Winning one of the highest abuse of process verdicts in New York history ($2.6 million, plus punitive damages to be awarded later, in Brown v. Suggs, index no. 605492-00 (N.Y. Sup. 2007)) on behalf of a commission salesperson falsely accused of misconduct, in a case discussed in the New York Times and New York Magazine.
  • Successfully litigating with co-counsel Steven M. Sack the leading case under New York’s tip appropriation law, Samiento v. World Yacht, Inc., 10 N.Y.3d 70 (2008), a landmark hospitality industry case that helped put an end the widespread practice of New York restaurants and banquet operators adding an 18% or 20% “service charge” to the bill and then keeping it instead of distributing it to the waitstaff. See generally
  • Winning one of the highest abuse of process verdicts in New York history ($2.6 million, plus punitive damages to be awarded later, in Brown v. Suggs, index no. 605492-00 (N.Y. Sup. 2007)) on behalf of a commission salesperson falsely accused of misconduct, in a case discussed in the New York Times and New York Magazine.
  • Winning the State’s largest employment verdict in 2015 (a $6.181 million pregnancy discrimination verdict), in the case Santana v. G.E.B. Medical Management.
  • Successfully litigating with co-counsel Steven M. Sack the leading case under New York’s tip appropriation law, Samiento v. World Yacht, Inc., 10 N.Y.3d 70 (2008), a landmark hospitality industry case that helped put an end the widespread practice of New York restaurants and banquet operators adding an 18% or 20% “service charge” to the bill and then keeping it instead of distributing it to the waitstaff. See generally
  • Authoring a series of published articles with an in-depth analysis of New York’s wage payment law, Labor Law Article 6:
  1.  “Does New York’s Wage Payment Law Have a Gaping Loophole?”, Labor and Employment Law Journal, Vol. 41 No. 1 (Fall 2016, New York State Bar Association)
  2.  “Labor Law Article 6: A Misunderstood Law That Fully Protects All Employees Wages,” 80 Albany Law Review 1355 (2016/2017)
  3.  “Is There a Difference Between ‘Deducting’ and ‘Failing to Pay’ Wages?”, New York Law Journal (Nov. 14, 2018)

This journey reflects not just a career but a continuous quest for excellence, integrity, and the unwavering pursuit of justice.

Understanding Scott’s unique legal strategies

Why Clients Choose Us?

Moreover, our firm stands out for its innovative approach to legal services. We embrace cutting-edge technology and methodologies to enhance our efficiency and effectiveness, staying ahead in a rapidly evolving legal landscape.

Our dedication to clear communication, transparency, and ethical practices fosters long-lasting relationships with our clients. They know they can rely on us not just for legal expertise, but for a partnership that values their success as our top priority.

Streamlined Solutions for Every Legal Challenge

Find What You Need

How may we help you?

Choose the option that best describes your problem

Unpaid Overtime

Unpaid Minimum Wage

Unequal Pay based on gender or race

Pregnancy Discrimination

Sexual Harassment

Discrimination based on Disability or Medical Condition

Retaliation for complaining about/opposing unlawful discrimination or for reporting safety violations

Unpaid Commissions, Promised Bonuses, or Severance Pay

Discrimination based on Gender, Race, Age, Religion, or Sexual Orientation

Unpaid Overtime

Please answer a few questions so we understand how we can help you.

Do you/did you work in New York?

How long were you employed?

How many hours a week do you/did you work?

Did other similarly-situated employees work more than 40 hours a week without receiving overtime pay (i.e., time-and-a-half) for the overtime hours worked?

Unpaid Minimum Wage

Please answer a few questions so we understand how we can help you.

Do you/did you work in New York?

How long were you employed?

Did other similarly-situated employees work more than 40 hours a week without receiving overtime pay (i.e., time-and-a-half) for the overtime hours worked?

Unequal Pay based on gender or race

Please answer a few questions so we understand how we can help you.

Do you/did you work in New York?

How long were you employed?

Do the person(s) receiving higher pay than you have the same job duties as you?

Pregnancy Discrimination

Please answer a few questions so we understand how we can help you.

Do you/did you work in New York?

Were you terminated or are you about to be terminated by your employer?

Were two or more non-pregnant employees let go at or about the time you were let go?

Sexual Harassment

Please answer a few questions so we understand how we can help you.

Do you/did you work in New York?

The person who sexually harassed you was (check one):

Did you complain to HR or a manager about the sexual harassment?

Discrimination based on Disability or Medical Condition

Please answer a few questions so we understand how we can help you.

Do you/did you work in New York?

Were you terminated or are you about to be terminated by your employer?

Were two or more employees outside of your protected group let go at or about the time you were let go?

Retaliation for complaining about/opposing unlawful discrimination or for reporting safety violations

Please answer a few questions so we understand how we can help you.

Do you/did you work in New York?

How long were you employed?

Did you resign?

Unpaid Commissions, Promised Bonuses, or Severance Pay

Please answer a few questions so we understand how we can help you.

Do you/did you work in New York?

How long were you employed?

How much do you believe you are owed?

Discrimination based on Gender, Race, Age, Religion, or Sexual Orientation

Please answer a few questions so we understand how we can help you.

Do you/did you work in New York?

Were you terminated or are you about to be terminated by your employer?

Were two or more employees outside of your protected group let go at or about the time you were let go?

Law Offices of Scott A. Lucas Website Disclaimer, May 2024

Please note that the content on this website is intended for informational purposes only and is not intended to be, and should not be construed as, legal advice. It is possible that some of the information on this website may be inaccurate, incomplete, or may no longer be up-to-date in regard to your specific situation. Therefore, it is important to be aware that the Law Offices of Scott A. Lucas does not provide any express or implied warranties regarding the reliability or accuracy of the information on this website, or on any other websites that may be linked to it.

Please be advised that simply viewing this website does not establish an attorney-client relationship between you and the Law Offices of Scott A. Lucas. Therefore, you should not rely on the information provided on this website without first seeking legal advice from an attorney. Any statements made on this website should not be considered a guarantee of results. Additionally, any discussion of specific cases, job titles, or industries is not necessarily indicative of the results that the Law Offices of Scott A. Lucas has obtained in every case. Please note that each individual’s situation is unique, and you should consult with an attorney to obtain legal advice tailored to your specific circumstances. Finally, it is important to be aware that the Statute of Limitations may limit the time within which you can file a potential lawsuit.

Law Offices of Scott A. Lucas is located in Harrison, New York, and it founder and principal, Scott A. Lucas, is licensed to practice in the State of New York as well as the United States District Courts for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York. The firm also has affiliations in particular cases with attorneys licensed to practice in certain other jurisdictions within the country.

Please do not communicate with us using your employer’s computer. Additionally, please be advised that sending an email or any other form of communication to the Law Offices of Scott A. Lucas may not be secure, and may be subject to issues related to computer technology and network security. Please note that sending us an email or any other inquiry does not establish an attorney-client relationship with the Law Offices of Scott A. Lucas.

If you communicate with us through this site or otherwise in connection with a matter for which we do not already represent you, it is possible that your communication may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The Law Offices of Scott A. Lucas, however, will endeavor to protect your name and confidential information against disclosure, publication or unauthorized use.

Please be aware that in some jurisdictions, this website may be considered advertising. However, we would like to emphasize that this website is not intended to solicit clients or propose any type of transaction. Therefore, you should not act or rely solely on the information provided on this website without first seeking the advice of a licensed attorney in your state. It is important to note that hiring an attorney is a significant decision that should not be made solely on the basis of written information about our qualifications and experience.

The Law Offices of Scott A. Lucas has made every effort to comply with all legal and ethical requirements in the creation of this website. Please note that this website may contain links to external websites and other resources on the internet. These links have been provided for the purpose of helping viewers identify and locate additional resources, but they are not intended to suggest that the Law Offices of Scott A. Lucas either expressly or implicitly endorses, sponsors, or is affiliated with the information or companies referred to on those external websites

To the extent the State Bar rules require us to designate a principal office and/or single attorney responsible for this site, the Law Offices of Scott A. Lucas designates Scott A. Lucas, Law Offices of Scott A. Lucas, 600 Mamaroneck Ave., Suite 400, Harrison, NY 10528, as the attorney responsible for this site.The Law Offices of Scott A. Lucas does not offer any guarantee of case results in litigation or otherwise. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

© 2024 Law Offices of Scott A. Lucas – All rights reserved.